Money talks – Rory McIlroy flips his stance on PGA Tour–LIV Golf standoff

Rory McIlroy, who became the first invertebrate[1] winner of the Pebble Beach Pro-Am a couple of weeks ago, has totally flipped, in more ways than one, from PGA Tour crusader to LIV-accepting, bootlicking Donald Trump sycophant. According to a pair of articles penned by unabashed Rory fanboy Josh Schrock at Golf.com (‘Get over it’: Rory McIlroy says PGA Tour-LIV unification works only in 1 way; ‘On the Tour’s side:’ Rory McIlroy thinks Donald Trump can help PGA Tour-PIF negotiations), McIlroy has shed his guise as stalwart defender of the PGA Tour, not only adopting a “can’t we all just get along” attitude with respect to the Saudi-backed LIV Golf league, but sucking up to the convicted felon who lied and hoodwinked his way into the White House for a second term (to our nation’s shame), saying that the convicted felon, failed businessman, and oligarch suck-up can help with negotiations between the PGA Tour and the LIV Golf league.

With the exception of the reigning U.S. Open champion Bryson DeChambeau (and just typing that made me throw up in my mouth a little) few, if any, of the defectors were or are still players in the top tier of the game—and I say good riddance to them all.

The greedy pros who ditched the PGA Tour to join LIV signed on with an outfit whose goal was to destroy the tour that had, in many cases, made them multi-millionaires, joining a league that is funded by a blood-soaked, misogynistic, religio-authoritarian monarchy with one foot in the Middle Ages who see it as a way to put a good face on their heinous government by participating in international sports[2].

Rory and other LIV apologists on the PGA Tour are caving in because the Tour leadership panicked at the loss of a few big names to LIV and instituted changes that will open the way to making players who stuck with the PGA Tour even richer. (Rory himself has benefitted from these changes: as the winner of the Signature event at Pebble Beach two weeks ago, McIlroy banked a $3.6 million paycheck thanks to the now-$20 million total purse for those select events.)

And now McIlroy is sucking up to the heinous grifter and convicted felon who lied his way into the White House, again, in hopes of cementing an agreement that will put the PGA Tour in bed with not one but two criminal regimes—the Saudis and the current U.S. administration—all in the interests of padding his own already-over-stuffed bank account[3].

Some in the golf media see this attitude shift as personal “growth” on Rory’s part, viz the following quote:

“Everyone sees things through their own lens. McIlroy has  changed his opinion on a multitude of things, but that’s a sign of growth and evolution in any person. It doesn’t mean you have to agree with how the stance has changed or that the contradictions can’t be addressed.”

– Josh Schrock, Golf.com

Others, like myself, see it as giving up in the face of the realization that you are going to make a butt-ton of money no matter what happens, so why bother to push back any more?

Any number of the LIV defectors have shown a similar lack of character, notably Spaniard Jon Rahm, who very publicly declared that he was “playing for legacy, not money” and pledged to remain a PGA Tour player, until the Saudis waved a contract under his nose that has been reported[4] to be worth $300 million over several years. In a press conference after his 2022 win in the Open Championship at St Andrews, Aussie Cam Smith waved away questions about a possible move to the Saudi-backed golf league, saying that he just played golf, his “team” worries about that stuff:

Q. Cam, apologies for having to bring this up in these circumstances, but your name continues to be mentioned, has been mentioned to me this week about LIV golf. What's your position? Are you interested? Is there any truth to suggestions that you might be signing?
CAMERON SMITH: I just won the British Open, and you're asking about that. I think that’s pretty not that good.
Q. I appreciate that, but the question is still there. Are you interested at all? Is there any truth in that?
CAMERON SMITH: I don't know, mate. My team around me worries about all that stuff. I'm here to win golf tournaments.

But Cam is the one signing on the dotted line and banking all that Saudi gelt.

Ever since two big sea-change events in the world of men’s professional golf—the immense popularity of Arnold Palmer (which coincided with the advent of television coverage of golf and the influx of that sweet TV money), and the arrival of Tiger Woods on the scene, which brought step-changes in both endorsement deals and tournament purses—the game has been a road to generational wealth for those at the top of the heap. No one is saying that it’s easy—golf is still a difficult game to play well, consistently, and fields are deep, but the money is there. Not everyone achieves multi-million dollar status, of course, but a damned good living can be made by those who make it into the pro ranks, and can stay. As middle-tier pro Kevin Kisner said in an interview back in January, 2021[5], “They give away a lot of money for 20th.”

(My favorite quote on the subject of making money in professional golf comes from the great Dan Jenkins, speaking through his character Kenny Lee Puckett in his 1974 golf novel, Dead Solid Perfect: “Compared to your basic millionaire like Jack Nicklaus, I’m nobody. But I can win myself about $200,000[6] a year if I can just manage to thump the ball around with my dick.”)

The ranks of men’s professional golf have become increasingly stratified in recent years—especially in the last couple of years, as the PGA Tour’s response to the emergence of LIV Golf has been to create the Signature Events mentioned above, limited-field no-cut events with purses bumped to $20 million from the measly $9 million paid out at run-of-the-mill Tour events. Rory McIlroy and some other inhabitants of the upper tiers of the game are pushing for more separation between the Haves and the (relatively speaking) Have-Nots in the game, greedily seeking entry into the One-Percenters Club on the back of their ability to knock a little white ball into a small hole in the ground starting from hundreds of yards away, doing so in fewer strokes than can those of us who play the game for recreation.

My final word on this subject again comes from the typewriter of Dan Jenkins, speaking as Kenny Lee Puckett:

“Now if you ask me why so many people want to put up so much money for us to compete for, I can’t give you a sensible answer. There’s no law that says there has to be a golf tour. 

If all the sponsors got together and decided they were weary of seeing us every year, it would be all over. Most of us would have to sit down on the curb and learn to play the harmonica, or something.”

[1] (That is to say, spineless.)

[2] (Also known as “sportswashing”.)

[3] (Rory’s current net worth is estimated at around US $170M.)

[4] (Jon Rahm LIV Golf contract, explained: How much money does he make from LIV deal in 2024?)

[5] Kevin Kisner had a hilarious response when asked if he can win anywhere on tour, https://www.golfwrx.com/644924/kevin-kisner-had-a-hilarious-response-when-asked-if-he-can-win-anywhere-on-tour/ Jan. 14, 2021.

[6] (Quote is from the 1999 edition of the book; that number is chump change these days.)

Adventures in putter-building: Frankenstein III

If you have been following my posts here for long enough you will have read (I hope…) several columns on the subject of putting, from why putting is hard, to how counterweighting your putter can help you make more putts, and how a graphite putter shaft can help (but not for the reasons generally touted by the folks who sell them.)

Like most golfers with something of an equipment addiction I own several putters, and consistent with my education and experience as a mechanical design engineer, I like to tinker with them. The five putters which I actually play (I have two or three more which are essentially antiques, of value only as curiosities) have all been bent more upright (within USGA limits, of course), tweaked as to loft (I prefer minimal to slightly negative loft – here’s why) and counterweighted for better balance and therefore better speed control.

The most recent addition to my stable is a self-built putter based on a Ben Hogan Golf BHB-01 plumber’s neck blade putter head. I installed the shaft that came with my Odyssey Golf Tank Cruiser 1 putter—which was re-shafted, for a while, with an early version of the BGT Stability Shaft (about which more here)—and my preferred Odyssey White Hot pistol-style grip. I drilled out the threaded fitting in the butt end of the Odyssey shaft to allow me more options for counterweighting than just the 15- and 30-gram counterweights that came in the Odyssey’s weight kit, and opened up a hole in the end of the Odyssey grip to allow the fitting of one of the range of Super Stroke Counter Core counterweights (25-gram, 50-gram, or 75-gram). I also filed an alignment mark on the top line and filled it with white paint.

The Odyssey Tank Cruiser, meanwhile, had the BGT Stability Shaft replaced with a $15 standard steel shaft. To reduce toe hang I removed the weight from the toe port in the sole, replacing it with cork, and installed a 20-gram weight in the heel port. I installed an Odyssey White Hot pistol-style grip, and opened up the hole in the butt end to take a Super Stroke counterweight. 

While the Ben Hogan-based putter is a “bitsa” build—put together from “bits of this and bits of that”—the real Frankenstein’s monster in my putter stable is the continuously evolving build that started out as a $17 new-old-stock Tight Lies blade putter that I purchased online. This putter, in one of its several modified iterations, was the one that I had in my bag in May 2019 when I played Pebble Beach during the USGA’s media day for the U.S. Open. It was a day that had its ups and downs, but one in which I had a great round on the greens, with eleven two-putt greens, and four one-putts.

Aside from a bit of tweaking for lie and loft, the first big change for this putter was the installation of the stock Odyssey shaft (with the 30-gram counterweight) when my Odyssey Tank Cruiser was getting fitted with the BGT Stability Shaft. From there I went to a more radical change, cutting down and transplanting a graphite shaft into the Tight Lies head—the shaft, an Aldila 350, came from a donor club: the driver that was part of my first set of garage-sale used clubs. As I explain in my column about the benefits of a graphite putter shaft, removing mass from the middle of the length of the club increases stability and improves speed control; “Frankenstein”, as I have dubbed the Tight Lies putter, was my first test bed for the benefits of this concept.

This putter went through several subsequent iterations that involved increasing amounts of lead tape on the head, with corresponding increases in counterweighting, all intended to bring it up to the same overall mass and swing weight as the modified Odyssey Tank. Damage to the shaft that occurred during a bout of loft/lie adjustment spelled the end of that particular experiment, so I decided to take it a step further.

Enter the latest iteration of the Tight Lies putter, dubbed Frankenstein III. It now incorporates a brand new graphite shaft, this time a Mitsubishi Rayon KURO KAGE Black Parallel iron shaft, stiff flex, .370 tip, cut down to yield my preferred 35-inch total length. To make the installation of a butt-end counterweight cleaner I sacrificed a Super Stroke grip for the threaded fitting which takes the Counter Core family of weights. Previous grip modifications to accommodate a grip weight involved drilling a hole in the butt end of the grip to a size that allowed the threads on the counterweight to bite into the rubber of the grip; gluing in the plastic threaded fitting from a Super Stroke grip makes the installation a bit tidier.

Frankenstein III, in all its glory

Shiny-new stiff-flex graphite shaft

Logo partly covered by the grip
shows that the shaft has been cut down

To complete the build I installed a 75-gram Super Stroke Counter Core weight. With a head weight of 391.8 grams, a shaft weight of 56.2 grams (less than half the weight, and at $29.95 less than 1/6 the cost, of the BGT Stability shaft), a grip weight of 67.2 grams, and an actual 74.0 grams of counterweight (plus a smidge for grip tape and adhesive) yields an all-up weight of 592.2 grams, or about 1 lb 5 oz. Thanks to the lack of the added lead tape that had previously been wrapped around the shaft of the 75-gram counterweight, this is about 20 grams shy of the weight of the previous iteration, and that of the modified Odyssey Tank. Loft remains at -1º, and the lie angle is 1º shy of the USGA limit, at 79º.

The 75-gram counterweight installed
in my preferred Odyssey putter grip

The swing weight of “Frankenstein III” is E5, making it a touch more head-heavy than its previous iteration at E4, and considerably more so than the modified Odyssey Tank, at D4, and the Hogan BHB-01 build, at D0. The new build feels well-balanced, and I have found it to be consistent and controllable when practicing on my office carpet (which stimps at about 13–14); I can’t wait for our current bout of rainy weather to end so that I can go try it out on real greens.

Playing around with putters is considerably easier and less critical than building or rebuilding full-swing clubs; because of the lower forces experienced by a putter during use you don’t have to worry so much about whether you got the crucial head-to-shaft bond exactly right. Even if you don’t go so far as to re-shaft a putter, a little bit of tinkering with counterweights in the grip and lead tape on the head may surprise you with the benefits that are derived from improving the balance of your “flat stick”.

“Compressing the ball” is an old wives’ tale

Oh me, oh my the September 24, 2024 article on Golf.com entitled Trevino’s secret for hitting solid irons made me shake my head in disbelief. Here’s Lee Trevino, the preeminent elder statesman of golf, promulgating one of the most egregious old wives’ tales in the game—stating that compressing the ball with your irons; no, more than that, actually pushing the ball into the ground, is necessary for getting the ball into the air.

Here is a direct quote from the piece:

“The secret to playing is to push the ball in the ground,” Trevino says. “What makes a ball come up into the air is compressing the ball into the ground.”

Here is another quote from the article, from the Journalism major[1] who wrote it:

“The secret to hitting solid shots with your irons is compressing the ball into the turf. This means you need to be hitting down on the ball at impact.”

The author of this piece got things half right in that paragraph, to wit: Yes, you should be hitting down on the ball with your irons (fairways and hybrids, too—but that is a discussion for another day); that is to say, club-to-ball contact should occur before the club head reaches the bottom of the swing arc, as the club head is still descending (this is often described as “hitting the little ball before the big ball”.) What he got wrong—really, really, wrong—is the part about compressing the ball into the turf.

Without getting into a discussion of force vectors and horizontal and vertical components of impact force, let’s use a visual aid. In the illustration below, the left-hand figure shows a club striking a ball above the equator, or horizontal centerline, of the ball. It is easy to visualize the result of that impact: while the club head is sweeping forward, and will impart some amount of forward motion to the ball, the downward motion of the club head as the swing continues will cause the ball to be driven downward, into the turf. Even the rankest novice will understand that this is a bad thing.

Now look at the figure on the right. As the club head is sweeping down and forward it contacts the ball first, a fraction of a second before it contacts the turf. The club head’s forward motion propels the ball forward, and due to the angle of the face, upward—and at the same time the downward motion of the club head imparts back spin on the ball due to the friction between the club face and the surface of the ball. Thanks to the aerodynamic phenomenon known as the Magnus Effect, back spin helps the ball rise higher than it would otherwise, adding distance to the shot. In addition to the added distance, the residual spin that remains when the ball lands can reduce rollout by imparting a braking action when the ball hits the turf.

Also apparent from the figure on the right is the path of the club head after contact with the ball (light blue line). Since the club face contacts the ball before the low point of the arc of the club head’s path, the club continues to move downward and forward through the turf after the ball leaves the club face, creating the nice divot that indicates a well-struck shot. The earlier in the swing that contact comes, the steeper the contact angle is and the greater the induced back spin will be, but there is a point of diminishing returns, because the earlier that contact comes the deeper the sole of the club will dig into the turf .

It is the combination of the downward motion of the club head with club-to-ball contact before club-to ground contact that results in a great iron shot—and it is the act of hitting ball then turf, which can be described as “hitting down on the ball”, that is often described (as in the Golf.com article linked to above) as “compressing the ball”, though I have never before seen or heard it characterized as “pushing the ball into the ground.”

The article concludes with a couple of paragraphs that are a mixed bag. The author correctly cites the tendency of the less-skilled (shall we say) golfer to create a scooping motion, by breaking the wrists forward at contact, in an attempt to help the ball into the air. 

“Often time amateurs will try to help the ball in the air with a scooping motion when they come into impact. This is a poor idea as it will rob you of power and limit the amount of spin you can produce, meaning the ball will actually fly lower than if you hit down on the ball.”

This action lofts-up the club face and tends to slide the club head underneath the ball, simultaneously popping the ball up more than propelling it forward, because of the higher loft, and reducing the spin-induced lift that increases carry distance, due to poor contact.

Then Lee, bless his heart, gets it all wrong, again:

“What happens is people put what we call an overspin on it and the ball never gets in the air,” Trevino says. “Every shot you hit, your first intention is to compress the ball in the ground.”

So-called “overspin”, or top spin, is not unknown in club-to-ball interactions, but while it is very common in that other country-club game, tennis, it is very difficult to produce in golf. It is accomplished in tennis by tilting the top edge of the racket forward and hitting up on the ball while simultaneously rolling the wrist in the direction of the swing. Creating top spin in golf would require the club face to contact the ball above the ball’s equator with negative loft. Even in the case of the common duffer’s mistake of hitting the turf behind the ball and then catching the ball on the upswing of the club’s arc, the resulting poor contact results only in reduced spin and ball speed, not top spin. The result that Lee is referring to is generally the result of a combination of chunking the ball (hitting the ground behind the ball) and scooping the club.

***************

If I were being kind I would give both Lee and the author of the cited article the benefit of the doubt and say that when they say “hit down on the ball” and “compress the ball into the ground” what they mean is “catch the ball before the low point of the swing”, but when the same mistaken characterization is repeated throughout an article, I wonder if they don’t actually believe exactly what they are saying. In any event, it is appalling to me that a leading golf publication would promulgate what is at best a poor description of the required action, and at worst a totally incorrect description of the proper way to hit a golf ball, and it is a disservice to the golfing public to present such misinformation.

Golf is hard enough, guys…

---

[1] Longtime readers of my work may be aware of the thinly-veiled contempt in which I hold the Journo and English Lit majors who write about technical aspects of the game of golf which they are ill-prepared to understand, let alone explain to their audience. I will name no names in this column— but his name is on the article, so…

PGA Tour’s Napa event has a new sponsor – Procore

While the big boys and girls of the sports-reporting world were in Paris covering the Olympics and the first day of Olympic golf competition, some of we lesser lights in the world of golf media converged on the Silverado Resort in beautiful Napa, California for the media day for the upcoming 2024 edition of the PGA Tour’s Napa Valley stop.

It was an intriguing invitation, because the early communications from the event’s organizers had labeled it as the “Napa Valley Golf Championship”, signaling that the presenting sponsor of the last three years, the cybersecurity company Fortinet, had pulled out after completing only half of its six-year commitment to bankroll the tournament. Frankly, I wasn’t too surprised, because Fortinet had made it clear all along, back in the days before the Tour’s return to a calendar-year schedule, that they wanted Napa, and they wanted that special spot in the tournament calendar that this event occupied.

“We made a six-year commitment to the PGA Tour as a partner to have the Fortinet Championship, and the concept was we would be the first event of the season, and kick off the FedEx Cup points. That’s changed.

“We’re working very tightly with them—they know our preference. They know what we’re willing to do and it has a lot to do with Napa.”

Two years ago, in a press conference before the second year of Fortinet’s tenure as the presenting sponsor of this event, I asked their Senior VP of Marketing for North America, Jim Overbeck, what they thought about the schedule changes:

“I told them as the music’s playing, when it stops we don’t want to be in a worse chair than when we started. They’ve been a great partner with us, and they’re working to move some roadblocks to make sure that we’re in a really good spot.”

Evidently those roadblocks couldn’t be overcome, because here we are in 2024 and Fortinet is out. John Norris, the PGA Tour’s Senior VP of Tournament Business, politely declined to comment on the terms of Fortinet’s exit.

Past business aside, in what was almost literally an 11th-hour deal, Procore Technologies, Inc., a construction management software company based in Carpinteria, California, near Santa Barbara, has signed on for an initial two-year commitment to sponsor what will now be known as the Procore Championship. (I’m not exaggerating when I call it an 11th-hour deal: the agreement was signed at 8:00 p.m. on July 30th, the night before the July 31st media day press conference.)

Fans will notice some differences from last year’s event, with a return to parking at several sites along Atlas Peak Road, all served by shuttles, and the entrance to the tournament grounds once again just to the left of the main lawn, adjacent to the pro shop.

Though the post-round concerts won’t be back this year, the tournament’s events committee and the new sponsor’s management are committed to making the Procore Championship a fan-friendly event that highlights the special qualities of the Napa Valley region while providing a great golf-viewing experience.

Tournament rounds will take place September 12 – 15, at Silverado Resort and Spa at 1600 Atlas Peak Road, Napa. More fan information, including ticket info, is available at https://procorechampionship.com.

Napa Valley Golf Championship calls for volunteers

The rebranded Napa Valley PGA Tour event is putting out a call for volunteers to help run this year’s event. Formerly known as the Safeway Open and the Fortinet Championship, the Napa Valley Golf Championship, an official PGA TOUR event, takes place Sept. 12–15, 2024 at Silverado Resort in Napa, California.

If you have ever attended or even previously volunteered at a golf tournament, whether professional or amateur, you know how important the volunteer workers are to the running of an event. It is a fun, rewarding activity – I know, as I have volunteered at a number of USGA championship events – and a great chance to see, in this case, Tour-level professional golf close-up.

Committees seeking volunteers for the event include the hospitality committee, the supply and distribution committee, and the gallery management ambassador committee.

A branded uniform, including a polo, jacket and hat, in addition to other appreciation pieces, is included in the registration fee ($55 for new volunteers.)

For more information on committee descriptions and to sign up visit NapaValleyGolfChampionship.com/Volunteer/.

“Searching in St. Andrews”, by Sean Zak ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Spend a year in St. Andrews writing about golf? The year that the 150th Open Championship is being played at the Old Course, the literal Home of Golf? Any golf writer you can name would trade rounds at Pine Valley, Cypress Point and Seminole for that opportunity (well, maybe not Cypress…) – and in 2022, as the pandemic wound down and the Saudi-based revolution in men’s professional golf started to wind up, Sean Zak of Golf magazine did just that. The result is the book Searching in St. Andrews, a pleasant-enough read about an interesting and eventful year in the world of golf.

If you follow golf with more than a minimal level of interest you will already be aware of the big events of that year: Rory McIlroy fading in the stretch to let a mulleted Aussie with his eyes on Saudi millions and a tendency to pass the buck to his “team” steal the Claret Jug from his grasp, and LIV Golf erupting onto the scene with flashy dramatics and huge infusions of cash while some of the biggest names in men’s professional golf bailed on the professional tour that had already made them multi-millionaires for a chance to become extra-big multi-multi-millionaires. Against that background, a newly-single and newly-turned-30 Sean Zak took up residence in a 400-square-foot guest flat converted from an underused corner living room in a modest house in the Auld Grey Toon, and settled in to learn his way around the most famous city in the game of golf, in the country that invented the game.

The pages of the book are replete with the expected stories of interesting characters met, courses played, and libations consumed (maybe a few too many libations, in some cases); as well as some interesting behind-the-scenes looks at the genesis of LIV Golf’s disruptive entrance into the world of men’s professional golf. The latter is content that I don’t think you will find anywhere else, especially given that Zak was, on at least one occasion, one of only two golf media people present at a big LIV event – their flashy, over-the-top (and ultimately pointless) “draft” for the teams in their “Chuckles-the-Clown-puts-on-a-golf-tournament” event format.

Overall, Searching in St. Andrews is diverting read, treading the line between a notable exploration of an eventful year in men’s professional golf* and a boy’s-own tale of a freewheeling (but not without responsibilities) kid-in-a-candy-store year in a golfer’s dream world. The tales of boozing get old after a while, to be honest, and I was wielding my personal red pencil and a stack of sticky-note tabs noting places where, were I editing the book, I would be having a word or two with young Sean – but I think that most golfer-readers will enjoy both aspects of the book, and I think that it is a good choice for that golfing dad’s Father’s Day present come June.

* (I have specified “men’s professional golf” several times because, despite their protestations of “growing the game” the LIV Golf disruption is really only affecting the men’s professional game.)

Saturday at the “new look” Pebble Beach Pro-Am is just not the same

Saturday at the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am (and its previous incarnation, the Crosby) used to be special at the namesake course, Pebble Beach Golf Links. Since it’s the weekend, there are more fans, of course, and in the original format Saturday was the day that the three-course rota brought the biggest names among the celebrity amateur players to the home course.

On Saturdays Pebble Beach Golf Links would be teeming with fans who didn’t know a driver from a wedge; they came to see the beautiful views and to spot famous faces playing golf amongst those views. The golfers among the spectators reveled in the fact that many of those stars, even with their staff bags and top-of-the-line equipment, and their memberships at high-rent private clubs like Riviera, Bel Air, and L.A. Country Club, had golf games that they could relate to. They were thrilled to see the stars, and also happy to see them display their human side on a golf course.

All of that has gone by the wayside with the transformation of this unique classic event into one of the PGA Tour’s “Signature” events. In order to create a schedule of events that concentrate more players from the upper echelons of the Tour’s membership, the eight Signature tournaments on the 2024 schedule will have bigger purses (Pebble’s went from $9 million to $20 million), with a larger percentage to the winner; smaller fields (70 – 80) drawn from the top tier of the Tour’s members; and except for three player-hosted Signature Events – the Genesis Invitational, Arnold Palmer Invitational, and Memorial Tournament – no cut.

The Tour’s leadership seem to be of the opinion that a larger number of “big names” playing for four days straight will draw more fans to the course and the TV coverage, but to my mind these events represent a watered-down product with little of the drama inherent in the make-the-cut or-go-home tournament format that we have known for years.

Not everyone is unhappy about the new format, of course (see below.) There have always been the curmudgeonly grumps (usually folks from outside the area) who complained about slow play, amateur antics (see Bill Murray…), etc., but the original format is a tradition that stretches back to 1947 – and there are plenty of us who are sorry to see it go.

Still lots to talk about…

New format aside, there was still some good-to-great golf on display today. Reigning U.S. Open champion Wyndham Clark put on a show, carding two eagles, nine birdies, and a bogey on the way to a course record* 60 and the lead in the clubhouse at 17-under. Friday co-leader Ludvig Åberg, playing five holes behind Clark, was sitting at 15-under when Clark tapped in for his 60, and was in good position to challenge for the lead, as was last week’s winner of the Farmers Insurance Open, Matthieu Pavon, at 14-under through fourteen holes.

A clutch of players at 13-under – Jason Day, Mark Hubbard, Sam Burns, and another Friday co-leader, Thomas Detry; and a couple of big names at 12-under, Justin Thomas and Scottie Scheffler – could all have been said to be in the hunt for the tournament title as Clark’s ball dropped for the historic 60.

As it turned out, the third round finished with a pack on Wyndham Clark’s tail. Ludvig Åberg made only his second birdie of the back nine on #18 to close to within a stroke at 16-under; Matthieu Pavon closed out a string of six pars with a birdie on #18 for a 15-under; former San Jose State golfer Mark Hubbard birdied 18 and joined Thomas Detry at 14-under, and Scottie Scheffler birdied #18 to join Jason Day, 2023 AT&T Pro-Am champ Tom Hoge, and Justin Thomas at 13-under, T6, four strokes back. Sam Burns rounds out the top 10 alone at 12-under – and five strokes back is the most a reasonable assessor would give any chance of being able to come from behind to steal a win.

The weather, though…

High winds and significant rainfall amounts are predicted overnight into Sunday morning, and as play wound down Chief referee Gary Young came into the media center and laid out the possibilities for the tournament’s finish: Weather conditions will be evaluated overnight, and a decision on Sunday play made at 5:00 a.m. Players will be messaged at 5:15 a.m. as to whether play will proceed; wind and rain conditions will determine whether play will take place. Due to the anticipated conditions, no spectators will be allowed on the course on Sunday.

If play starts on Sunday, but the round cannot be finished, a Monday finish is in play, but ONLY if play can be concluded on Monday. Current green speeds can sustain play in winds up to ≈40 mph, but a combination of the wind and the effects of additional rain on an already soggy golf course will determine how, and when, the event is wrapped up. Sunday conditions are expected to be the most severe, so fans will be allowed on the course on Monday.

Stay tuned, folks.

* Preferred lies were in play, so…